This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Protonolysis reactions between dimethylamido titanium(IV) catecholate [Ti(CAT)(NMe 2 ) 2 ] 2 and neopentanol or tris( tert -butoxy)silanol gave catecholato-bridged dimers [(Ti(CAT)(OCH 2 t Bu) 2 )(HNMe 2 )] 2 and [Ti(CAT){OSi(O t Bu) 3 } 2 (HNMe 2 ) 2 ] 2, respectively. Analogous reactions using the dimeric dimethylamido titanium(IV) (3,6-di- tert -butyl)catecholate [Ti(CAT t Bu 2 -3,6)(NMe 2 ) 2 ] 2 yielded the monomeric Ti(CAT t Bu 2 -3,6)(OCH 2 t Bu) 2 (HNMe 2 ) 2 and Ti(CAT t Bu 2 -3,6)[OSi(O t Bu) 3 ] 2 (HNMe 2 ) 2 . The neopentoxide complex Ti(CAT t Bu 2 -3,6)(OCH 2 t Bu) 2 (HNMe 2 ) 2 engaged in further protonolysis reactions with Si–OH groups and was consequentially used for grafting onto mesoporous silica KIT-6. Upon immobilization, the surface complex [Ti(CAT t Bu 2 -3,6)(OCH 2 t Bu) 2 (HNMe 2 ) 2 ]@[KIT-6] retained the bidentate chelating geometry of the catecholato ligand. This convergent grafting strategy was compared with a sequential and an aqueous approach, which gave either a mixture of bidentate chelating species with a bipodally anchored Ti(IV) center along with other physisorbed surface species or not clearly identifiable surface species. Extension of the convergent and aqueous approaches to anatase mesoporous titania (m-TiO 2 ) enabled optical and electronic investigations of the corresponding surface species, revealing that the band-gap reduction is more pronounced for the bidentate chelating species (convergent approach) than for that obtained via the aqueous approach. The applied methods include X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy, and solid-state UV/vis spectroscopy. The energy-level alignment for the surface species from the aqueous approach, calculated from experimental data, accounts for the well-known type II excitation mechanism, whereas the findings indicate a distinct excitation mechanism for the bidentate chelating surface species of the material [Ti(CAT t Bu 2 -3,6)(OCH 2 t Bu) 2 (HNMe 2 ) 2 ]@[m-TiO 2 ].
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sonström et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: