Observational analysis demonstrates floor-level structural tracking in a high-rise building using only roof and basement seismic data, indicating simplified real-time health assessment.
Seismic ambient noise enables non-invasive monitoring of high-rise buildings, but existing indicators trade floor-level localization for operational simplicity. Resonance-frequency changes track whole-building stiffness but poorly localize structural variations, whereas inter-floor interferometry localizes them through computationally intensive comparisons with reference records. Here we use interpretable machine learning to retain floor-level localization without repeated interferometric analysis. From 22 days of recordings on every floor of a 21-storey building on thick sediments in Shanghai, interferometry identifies wind-associated velocity reductions of about 2% at F6–F7 and F9–F10. An XGBoost model using only basement and roof resonance and polarization parameters predicts intermediate-floor dynamics, and its attribution profile shows transitions at the same levels. This correspondence indicates that the model retains floor-level spatial sensitivity. The candidate zones may reflect modular stiffness and load-transfer contrasts. Once trained, the model predicts the resonance frequency, vibration azimuth, and polarization dip of intermediate floors using only basement and roof recordings, without repeated inter-floor interferometry or pre-event reference records. Linpeng Qin and colleagues combine seismic ambient noise analysis with interpretable machine learning to monitor floor-level dynamics in a high-rise building on thick sediments. The model identifies transitions near floors F6–F7 and F9–F10 using only basement and roof recordings, consistent with interferometric velocity reductions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: