Longitudinal survey reveals psychosocial determinants and hospital tier predict antibiotic stewardship decisions among clinicians, highlighting the need for context-tailored interventions.
Inappropriate antibiotic use contributes to antimicrobial resistance, yet much stewardship evidence is cross-sectional and intention-based. We conducted a two-wave longitudinal survey of clinicians in Chinese hospitals approximately 11 months apart (baseline September–October 2024; follow-up August–September 2025) to examine whether baseline psychosocial factors predicted follow-up stewardship-aligned responses to four clinical vignettes and whether associations varied by hospital level. Among 1,420 clinicians with linked responses, higher follow-up vignette scores were independently associated with stronger reasoned-action beliefs, fewer perceived barriers, greater self-efficacy, stronger knowledge and skills, greater social support, and higher perceived patient-centred benefits in both structural equation modelling and robust regression analyses. TPB-related beliefs were not independently associated after mutual adjustment. Hospital level moderated the association between reasoned-action beliefs and follow-up vignette responses, with stronger associations in tertiary than primary hospitals. Stewardship interventions may therefore need to address capability, confidence, supportive environments, and institutional context in addition to attitudes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: