Conceptual analysis demonstrates how narrative-emotional identity shapes offenders' self-understanding, highlighting new avenues for intervention and desistance in criminal justice.
This article develops a conceptual dialogue between victim-offender overlap (VOO) scholarship, narrative criminology, and the Criminal Narrative Experience (CNE) framework. It argues that the Dejected Revenger-Victim (DRV) role should not be treated as evidence of the VOO, but as a narrative-emotional configuration through which perceived victimhood, grievance, helplessness, revenge, agency, and responsibility shape offenders’ self-understandings. By distinguishing aggregate patterns of victimization and offending from individual-level narrative meaning, the article shows how CNE can extend criminological discussion of harm, responsibility, intervention, desistance, punishment, and future research within contemporary criminal justice contexts without excusing offending or minimizing victims’ experiences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charlton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: