Key result
Ultrasound guidance linked to ~11-fold higher odds of distal radial access success versus palpation in weak pulses.
Why the study?
Ultrasound-guided puncture has been proposed to improve distal radial access, but whether its benefit varies according to distal radial artery pulse strength was unknown.
Does ultrasound-guided puncture improve distal radial access success in patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention?
Observational (n=1,454)
Yes
Does ultrasound-guided puncture improve distal radial access success in patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention?
Ultrasound guidance significantly improves distal radial access success and reduces access time specifically in patients with absent or weak pulses, supporting a selective, pulse-guided strategy for ultrasound use.
US guidance may enhance DRA success in weak/absent pulses; leaves open routine use without randomized confirmation.
Background: Ultrasound (US)-guided puncture has been proposed to improve distal radial access (DRA), although its benefit may vary according to anatomical and clinical factors.Aims: To evaluate whether the association between US-guided puncture and DRA success varies according to the pulse strength of the distal radial artery.Methods: We analyzed 1454 consecutive DRA procedures from the multicenter DISTAL Registry (August 2020-November 2024).Pulse grades were combined as absent or weak (0-1) and normal or strong (2-3).The primary outcome was DRA success.Multivariable logistic regression with interaction testing and a 2-stratum Mantel-Haenszel sensitivity analysis were used.Results: Overall success was 96.8% and was similar with and without US guidance (97.3% vs. 95.7%;P = 0.14).US guidance was associated with higher success in grades 0-1 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 11.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.97-31.61;P <0.001), but not in grades 2-3 (adjusted OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.33-3.38;P = 0.92; interaction P <0.001).The Mantel-Haenszel sensitivity analysis yielded an OR of 2.62 (95% CI, 1.46-4.71;P <0.001), with significant heterogeneity.Access time was shorter with US guidance in patients with weak pulse. Conclusions:The association between US guidance and DRA success was pulse-dependent, with higher success in the combined absent or weak category but not in the normal or strong category.Access time was also shorter with US guidance, most markedly in patients with a weak pulse.A pulse-guided strategy may optimize US use in DRA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rivera et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Distal radial access for coronary procedures (n=1,454). Ultrasound-guided puncture vs. Palpation-guided (non-ultrasound-guided) puncture was evaluated on Distal radial access success in patients with absent or weak pulse (grades 0-1) (adjusted OR 11.20, 95% CI 3.97-31.61, p=<0.001). Ultrasound-guided puncture was associated with significantly higher distal radial access success compared to palpation in patients with absent or weak pulses (adjusted OR 11.20), but not in those with normal or strong pulses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: