Key result
Palpable distal radial arteries are not linked to higher cannulation success than non-palpable arteries.
Why the study?
The optimal technique for achieving successful cannulation in distal transradial access for coronary procedures remains under investigation due to higher crossover rates.
Does a palpable distal radial artery improve successful cannulation in patients undergoing coronary procedures?
Meta-Analysis (n=435)
Does a palpable distal radial artery improve successful cannulation in patients undergoing coronary procedures?
Absolute Event Rate: 81.5% vs 80.3%
p-value: p=0.78
A palpable distal radial artery does not significantly increase cannulation success rates compared to a non-palpable artery when performed by experienced operators.
Non-palpable distal radial artery does not reduce cannulation success; challenges requirement for routine palpation before DRA in experienced hands.
Background Distal transradial access (DRA) is increasingly performed for coronary angiography and interventions, due to lower incidence of radial artery occlusion, faster hemostasis and decreased local complications rate. However, higher rates of crossover to other access sites remains the major limitation of DRA and the optimal technique for achieving successful cannulation remains under investigation. Purpose Aim of our analysis is to explore whether a palpable distal radial artery is associated with higher successful cannulation. Methods We conducted a patient-level pooled analysis using data from two randomized-controlled trials (RCT) on DRA. All patients with available data on distal radial artery palpation and cannulation’s success were included in our analysis. Results A total of 435 patients were included in our analysis; 84 and 351 from the two studies, respectively. Demographic characteristics, pharmacotherapy details and procedural indications did not differ between the two groups (palpable versus non – palpable DRA), except BMI, which was significantly increased in non – palpable DRA group (27.3 versus 28.3 kg/m2, p=0.034). A palpable DRA was found in 313 (72%) patients. Successful cannulation did not significantly differ between the patients with a palpable and a non-palpable DRA (81.5% versus 80.3%, p=0.78) Furthermore, a multivariable analysis excluded any interactions with demographic characteristics, pharmacotherapy details and indications of procedure. Conclusions Our analysis showed that a non-palpable distal radial artery is not associated with lower cannulation success rates. Accordingly, the palpation of the DRA may not be required for achieving better cannulation results. As these findings have been obtained among experienced operators, further research is required to validate the generalizability of our results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsigkas et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary procedures (n=435). Palpable distal radial artery vs. Non-palpable distal radial artery was evaluated on Successful cannulation (p=0.78). A palpable distal radial artery was not associated with higher cannulation success rates compared to a non-palpable artery during coronary procedures (81.5% vs 80.3%, p=0.78).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: