Conceptual framework introduces a native architecture for quantum communication systems, highlighting verifiable assurance and semantic integration over standard digital abstractions.
Quantum 1 Communications. Quantum communication is often described through concepts inherited from digital networking, including packets, layers, sessions, and retransmission. Those analogies are useful for transition and deployment, but they can obscure the physical character of quantum information: quantum resources may be non-copyable, stateful, measurement-dependent, short-lived, and irreversibly consumed. This preprint presents the conceptual architecture of Quantum Communication (Q1C) as a quantum-native framework organized around four engineering concerns: resources, transformations, causal classical control, and evidence. A service begins with a declared intent; the system identifies or creates suitable resources, performs a controlled sequence of physical and logical operations, and returns an outcome whose quality and scope are bound to explicit evidence. The framework preserves established quantum constraints, including no-cloning, no-signalling, the classical communication requirement of teleportation, and protocol-specific security boundaries. QHD v4.0 is retained as the assurance and provenance plane, while pairwise exclusivity, quantum key distribution, distributed execution, continuous-variable telemetry, and OSI-style deployment mappings are treated as optional profiles rather than universal foundations. The architecture is intended to support reproducible science, cross-platform integration, auditable industrial pilots, and future automation. Over a ten-year horizon, artificial intelligence could use Q1C records and constraints to assist calibration, resource allocation, scheduling, anomaly detection, protocol discovery, and evidence review, provided that uncertainty, human authority, and abstention remain explicit. The model is therefore proposed not as a new physical communication mechanism, but as a practical semantic and assurance framework for building quantum-hybrid systems without forcing them into inherited digital abstractions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
CARLOS DANIEL BORREGO ROMERO (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: