Conceptual analysis explores pedagogical responses to wicked problems in higher education, suggesting that embracing despair builds student capacity to tolerate complex uncertainties.
Higher education often treats negative emotions as problems to be managed or removed. This paper argues that a wicked problems approach to teaching evokes a distinct emotion, which I term despair, and develops an alternative framework for understanding it. Despair, I argue, is the affective response to a cognition-agency gap that emerges when individuals recognise the complexity of a wicked problem and the inability of available approaches to resolve it. This felt distance can evoke two responses: nihilism or naive hope – to ignore the problem, or to run after solutions regardless of fit. Instead, this paper argues for a middle-ground approach: sitting with despair, recognising that one's response is due not to one's own limitations but to the inherent nature of the wicked problems themselves. It outlines a variety of ways to sit with despair in the classroom, allowing students to build a negative capability that better tolerates uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rebecca Grace Tan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: