Case study reveals governance implementation gaps in mining compensation management among affected communities, highlighting the need for legal reforms to ensure intergenerational equity.
This study examines the perceptions of mine-affected community members regarding the governance framework for compensation assessment and payment, as well as intergenerational considerations in managing compensation proceeds. Focusing on two communities within the Newmont Ahafo South Mine's catchment area, the research showcases the temporal effects and distributive justice that exist in large-scale mining land acquisitions. Using Newmont Ghana Gold Limited as a case study, the paper analyzes responses from 115 community members and five representatives from the Compensation Negotiation Committee in the study areas. The results reveal a disparity between good governance principles and actual implementation procedures, exacerbated by a weak legal and regulatory regime. Consequently, the study discusses the legal and policy implications of current practices and underscores the need for regulatory reforms that promote intergenerational equity in mining compensation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ajabuin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: