Cluster randomized trial protocol evaluates digital outdoor exercise self-management in mildly frail older adults, suggesting pathways to integrate community-based physical activity programs.
Objectives: This project aims to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and implementation of a digitally supported outdoor exercise facility-based integrative physical activity self-management intervention for mildly frail community-dwelling older adults. Hypothesis to be tested: The intervention group is more effective in improving long-term physical activity behavioral change, and other health outcomes than the active control group. Design and subjects: The hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial will evaluate the effectiveness by a two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial and evaluate the reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance by administrative records, fidelity checklist and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders. Two hundred and forty older adults aged 60 years or above, obtaining a frailty score of 1 to 3, with inadequate physical activity level, will be recruited from community. Interventions: Older adults mildly frail will receive four weekly one-hour physical activity self-management workshops with outdoor exercise facilities visits. The intervention is also supported by app and trained volunteers. Outcomes measures: Physical activity level, mental well-being, social loneliness, exercise self-efficacy, pain, and information on reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance will be collected. Data analysis: Differential changes in the effectiveness outcomes will be assessed using a generalized estimating equation model, and quantitative and qualitative implementation data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis, respectively. Expected results: The collected effectiveness and implementation data are expected to inform the potential for integrating the project model with existing elderly services for mildly frail older adults in Hong Kong.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janet Lok Chun Lee (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: