Key result
One-year DAOH after first HFrEF hospitalization increases by ~9 days from 2011 to 2019.
Why the study?
Conventional postdischarge monitoring focuses on readmission and mortality, which may not summarize cumulative patient-centered health.
Cohort (n=10,147)
Yes
Mean Difference: 1.16 (95% CI 0.57–1.75)
Absolute Event Rate: 301% vs 291.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Between 2011 and 2019 in Singapore, 1-year days alive and out of hospital improved for patients after a first HFrEF hospitalization, though 30-day outcomes remained unchanged and improvements were inequitable across demographic groups.
BACKGROUND: Conventional postdischarge monitoring for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction focuses on readmission and mortality, but these end points may not summarize cumulative patient-centered health. We examined whether secular trends in conventional end points translated into improved days alive and out of hospital (DAOH), and whether trends differed by age, sex, and ethnicity. METHODS: Using the Singapore Cardiovascular Longitudinal Outcomes Database, we conducted a population-based cohort study of patients discharged alive after first HF with reduced ejection fraction hospitalization during 2011 to 2019. We estimated risk-adjusted annual trends in 30-day and 1-year DAOH, all-cause and HF-specific readmission, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and tested trend heterogeneity by age, sex, and ethnicity with multiplicity adjustment. RESULTS: Among 10 147 patients (median age, 68.9 years; 31.5% women; 65.4% Chinese; 20.0% Malay), risk-adjusted 30-day DAOH did not change materially (annual change, 0.01 [95% CI, −0.03 to 0.05] d/y; P -trend=0.554), whereas 30-day HF-specific readmission declined, with no change in 30-day all-cause readmission, all-cause mortality, or cardiovascular mortality. In contrast, 1-year DAOH improved from 291.7 to 301.0 days (1.16 [95% CI, 0.57–1.75] d/y; P -trend <0.001). In parallel, 1-year HF-specific readmission, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality declined, while 1-year all-cause readmission remained stable. Improvements were not uniform across population subgroups. Declines in HF-specific readmission were steeper in men than women at 30 days and 1 year, and 1-year DAOH gains were greater among Malay than Chinese patients after multiplicity adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement was seen in 1-year but not 30-day DAOH after first HF with reduced ejection fraction hospitalization, alongside reductions in 1-year HF-specific readmission, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. Dissimilar slopes highlight potentially inequitable benefits. DAOH may provide a patient-centered complement to conventional end points for monitoring burden and equity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=10,147). Hospitalization year (2011 to 2019) vs. Earlier hospitalization years was evaluated on 1-year days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) (annual change 1.16 d/y, 95% CI 0.57-1.75, p=<0.001). From 2011 to 2019, 1-year days alive and out of hospital after first HFrEF hospitalization improved from 291.7 to 301.0 days (annual change 1.16 days/year; 95% CI 0.57-1.75; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: