Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational study demonstrates high grading accuracy for student artwork using combined AI algorithms, suggesting effective auxiliary feedback in creative education.
Against the background of the digital transformation of art education, this study addresses two persistent problems in art design teaching evaluation: insufficient semantic evaluation of students' works and incomplete assessment of image quality. We construct a CLIP-SF-IQA (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training-Spatial Feature Image Quality Assessment) evaluation system in which CLIP extracts image-text semantic features related to theme, style, and design intention, while SF-IQA estimates no-reference technical quality; an adaptive feature-level fusion module then produces the comprehensive evaluation result. The fusion system achieves color coordination, composition logic, and style consistency matching degrees of 89.7%, 87.4%, and 91.2%, respectively. Its Pearson correlation with the aggregated teacher score is 0.91 with a mean absolute error of 3.2 points, and its average evaluation time is 2.1 min per work, corresponding to a 5.71-fold speed-up over manual evaluation. These results indicate that the proposed system can provide efficient and interpretable auxiliary evidence for preliminary assignment evaluation, staged feedback, and work diagnosis, while final pedagogical judgments remain under teacher supervision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong Cui (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: