Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey reveals significant gaps in institutional support for LGBTQ+ communication sciences and disorders students, highlighting the urgent need for faculty-led climate improvements.
Purpose: The purpose of the survey was to understand the positive and negative experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other related gender/sexual orientation identities (LGBTQ+) communication sciences and disorders (CSD) students, which were associated with their academic training to learn how to better support these students. Method: The climate survey comprised demographic questions, agreement statements, and open-ended responses. Four thematic types of agreement statements included the following: respect for LGBTQ+ individuals and other marginalized groups, restroom access, resource availability/awareness, and gender-affirming voice training. Results: Only two question responses received an average score of 4 ( agree ), suggesting an overall need for improvement in acceptance and support of LGBTQ+ CSD students. Additionally, students in discriminatory states had lower scores of agreement on questions related to respect, resources, and access to appropriate restrooms. Conclusion: CSD faculty need to improve the climate in CSD for acceptance, resources, and support for LGBTQ+ CSD students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lenell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: