Comparative evaluation demonstrates high salt and organic rejection using commercial nanofiltration membranes on cellulosic fiber wastewater, highlighting distinct performance trade-offs.
In this study, three potential commercial nanofiltration (NF) membranes (MPS-34, SR3D, and HFN-300) were assessed for the treatment of a real process stream of manmade cellulosic fiber (MMCF) industry. Among all, the membrane SR3D had the lowest skin thickness (140 ± 25 nm) and water contact angle (22 ± 3°), and the highest water permeability (4.52 L.m−2.h−1.bar−1). All membranes showed around 85% rejection of sodium sulfate and about 95% rejection of calcium chloride in a synthetic mixture of these salts. In presence of a salt-rich process stream, the best anti-fouling properties were observed with the HFN-300 membrane (92% FRR, 39% FDR, and 8% IFR). During testing with the process stream, permeate flux and solute rejection increased across all membranes with increasing cross-flow rate (CFR) and transmembrane pressure (TMP). To assess membrane effectiveness, a long-term study was conducted with intermittent cleaning at a TMP of 8.3 bar and a CFR of 100 L.h−1. The SR3D membrane exhibited higher permeate flux (average 18.4 L.m−2.h−1), lower COD (56%), and TDS rejection (66%), whereas the HFN-300 membrane showed better TDS rejection (68%) and COD rejection (64%) with moderate permeate flux (10.3 L.m−2.h−1). A semi-empirical model was developed to quantify the flux decline and rejection for the industrial process stream.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mondal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: