Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates accurate Herschel–Bulkley rheology prediction for water-based drilling fluids under high pressure and temperature, improving ultra-deep wellbore pressure calculations.
Accurate wellbore-pressure prediction is essential for safe drilling and pressure management in ultra-deep wells, where high temperature and pressure strongly alter drilling-fluid rheology. Existing rheological-parameter models are often calibrated for specific fluids and narrow temperature–pressure ranges, limiting their use in ultra-deep-well hydraulics. We measured three water-based drilling fluids at temperatures and pressures up to 210 °C and 206.5 MPa, compared seven rheological models, and developed a multidimensional evaluation method considering global fitting accuracy, extreme-condition performance, low-shear-rate representation, absolute shear-stress deviation, and model complexity. Using ambient-condition Herschel–Bulkley (H-B) parameters as baselines, we proposed a temperature–pressure (T-P)-coupled correction model requiring fluid-specific calibration to predict H-B parameters over the tested range. The fluids exhibited temperature-induced thinning, pressure-induced thickening, and shear-thinning behavior. The H-B model showed the best overall performance, with mean R2 values above 0.997 and mean absolute percentage errors below 2.5% for all fluids. Substituting the corrected parameters into the H-B equation yielded mean shear-stress errors no greater than 4.04%. Field validation showed that the T-P-coupled model reduced the mean circulating-pressure-loss error from 2.72% to 0.78%. This approach provides practical inputs for rheology estimation and circulating-pressure calculation in ultra-deep wells under wide temperature and pressure conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: