Computational screening study demonstrates dual-descriptor catalyst selection for borate reduction over hydrogen evolution, identifying refractory single-atom metals for circular fuel storage.
The electrochemical regeneration of sodium borohydride (NaBH4) from spent metaborate is a central bottleneck for circular hydrogen storage. (1) Background: The eight-electron reduction of the aqueous borate species B(OH)4− to BH4− is thermodynamically out-competed by the hydrogen-evolution reaction (HER) by about 0.41 V at every pH, so selectivity can only be won kinetically. (2) Methods: We advance an ambiphilic-site hypothesis, screen 30 candidate metal centres using entirely experimental, tabulated descriptors (bulk HER exchange current density; gas-phase M-O bond energy) with no new electronic-structure computation, and then audit the transferability of both descriptor axes against published, corrected DFT datasets for nitrogen-coordinated single-atom sites. (3) Results: At the parent-metal level, the two axes are orthogonal (Spearman ρ = 0.02) and the score passes a family-level experimental validation over seven bulk-electrode metals (ρ = 0.69; exact permutation p = 0.050), separating the HER-dominated noble-metal family from the single-atom Mn benchmark. The site-level audit shows that the oxophilicity axis transfers to M-N4 sites almost quantitatively (ρ = −0.84 pyridine-4N, −0.95 pyrrole-4N, n = 23) while the bulk HER axis does not, and that site-level scaling between oxygen and hydrogen binding narrows the productive window to oxophilic centres that over-bind hydrogen. (4) Conclusions: The site-anchored screen redirects the search from the parent-metal leaders (La, Ce, Y, Ti, Sc) to refractory single-atom centres, with W, Nb and Mo as priority synthesis targets (Re excluded on scarcity; Zr, Hf, Ta as data-supported extensions; Ti as the sustainability-anchored borderline case) and the lanthanides retained only as explicitly extrapolative candidates. All data and analysis code are openly deposited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talha Zafer (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: