Mixed-methods study reveals pervasive sports betting content normalizes gambling among college athletes, indicating a feedback loop driven by social media algorithms.
This study examined how prominent sports-betting accounts frame betting on social media and how college athletes encounter, interpret, and respond to such content. Using a mixed-methods design, this study combined a large-scale social media content analysis ( n = 38,925 posts from X) with semi-structured interviews ( n = 17) with current National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes. Findings indicated that betting-related content is highly concentrated among a small group of high-volume accounts and is frequently framed around opportunity, strategy, and entertainment, with comparatively little emphasis on gambling-related risk. Interview data revealed that college athletes experience pervasive, often unavoidable exposure to sports-betting content that contributes to perceptions of betting as a normalized component of sports culture despite institutional prohibitions. Integrating framing theory with normalization scholarship, the study proposes a feedback loop in which content production, engagement, algorithmic amplification, and repeated exposure reinforce the visibility and cultural legitimacy of sports betting. The findings have implications for college athletes’ well-being, media literacy, and responsible communication practices among media companies and sportsbook operators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stokowski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: