Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Panel study reveals digital transformation promotes corporate green innovation through capability configuration, indicating financial resource continuity is necessary to realize these gains.
Firms can invest in digitalization without necessarily producing greener inventions; resource organization and financial continuity may determine whether that potential is realized. This paper studies 24,126 firm-year observations for Chinese A-share listed firms over 2013–2024. Annual-report vocabulary is used to gauge digital transformation, whereas applications for green invention and utility-model patents indicate green innovation. The empirical design estimates changes within firms through firm and year fixed effects and firm-clustered standard errors, with additional specifications that absorb industry-year and province-year shocks. Guided by dynamic capability theory, capability-related resource configuration (CRC) is constructed as a firm-year archival proxy from knowledge investment, resource-allocation flexibility, and specialized human-capital support, corresponding to the absorptive, adaptive, and innovative dimensions used in prior Chinese A-share research. Financial resource availability (FRA) is treated as a boundary condition on the CRC–green innovation relationship. Lagged and alternative digitalization measures, propensity score matching, and an instrumental-variable specification are used as supplementary checks. The estimates link greater digital transformation to more green innovation. CRC carries a positive indirect association of 0.002152, equivalent to 9.2231% of the total association, which places it as a partial rather than predominant pathway. At low FRA, the CRC slope cannot be distinguished statistically from zero; at average and high FRA, it is positive. Although the supplementary estimates preserve the baseline direction, the evidence does not warrant definitive causal claims. Overall, the findings are consistent with a resource-configuration interpretation in which financial continuity conditions the CRC–green innovation relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: