Comparative case-control study demonstrates elevated serum Arginase-1 reflects hemolytic burden in sickle cell anemia and β-thalassemia, suggesting potential utility as a hemolytic biomarker.
Objectives: Chronic hemolysis is a central feature of sickle cell anemia (SCA) and β-thalassemia and contributes to vascular dysfunction through disruption of arginine metabolism and nitric oxide homeostasis. Arginase-1 has emerged as a potential mediator of these processes; however, comparative evidence across major hemoglobinopathies remains limited. Methods: This analytical comparative case–control study included 135 adults: 45 patients with SCA, 45 patients with β-thalassemia, and 45 healthy controls. Serum Arginase-1 concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and evaluated in relation to established hemolytic biomarkers. Group comparisons, correlation analyses, multivariable regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. Results: Serum Arginase-1 levels differed significantly among groups, increasing progressively from healthy controls (21.02 ng/mL) to β-thalassemia (39.54 ng/mL) and SCA (54.58 ng/mL) ( p = 2.84 × 10 -56 ). Arginase-1 correlated strongly with lactate dehydrogenase (r = 0.84), indirect bilirubin (r = 0.80), and reticulocyte percentage (r = 0.85) (all p < 0.001) but not with ferritin. Disease category was the strongest independent predictor of Arginase-1 levels in multivariable analysis (R 2 = 0.822; adjusted R 2 = 0.814). ROC analysis demonstrated strong discriminatory ability within the study cohort (area under the curve = 0.9936; 95% confidence interval: 0.9801–1.0000), with an observed sensitivity of 96.67% and specificity of 100.00% at a study-derived cutoff of 32.90 ng/mL. Conclusion: Arginase-1 is markedly elevated in SCA and β-thalassemia and closely reflects hemolytic burden. The observed discriminatory performance within this study cohort suggests that Arginase-1 may have potential utility as a biomarker of hemolysis; however, these findings require external validation in independent populations before any clinical application can be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hawar Mohammed Saeed (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: