Geometric modeling demonstrates that Lenz's 6π^5 proton-electron mass ratio corresponds to an 11-dimensional volume ratio, highlighting a unique recreational construction.
That the proton-to-electron mass ratio m_p/m_e ≈ 1836.15 can be approximated by 6π^5 = 1836.118 is a well-known numerical coincidence, dating from an extremely short 1951 note by F. Lenz. The present paper shows that 6π^5 need not be read as mere number-matching: it can be drawn, in eleven dimensions, as the ratio of the volume of the unit ball to the total volume of twenty congruent, non-overlapping cross-polytopes (the eleven-dimensional relatives of the octahedron). Concretely, one of the eleven coordinates is labeled t (a label only) and on the remaining ten axes I take the 2 × 10 = 20 points that I call the equatorial configuration. At each of them I place a translated copy of the standard eleven-dimensional cross-polytope of circumradius 1. If the proton is the unit 11-ball, and the electron the twenty copies taken together, the ratio of the two volumes is exactly 6π^5; the agreement with the measured mass ratio remains approximate, with relative error 1.88 × 10^-5.Constructions that realize 6π^5 as an exact ratio of volumes already exist in the literature, built from the volumes of Lie groups and related objects (Section 1); the present one reaches the same value with elementary geometry alone, in a dimension that modern physics singles out for independent reasons (eleven-dimensional supergravity, M-theory). This paper is a piece of recreational mathematics, and has nothing to do with any of my professional duties. On the other hand, a numerical control experiment confirms that a finite toolbox of small primes and π produces, in abundance, agreement as good as that of 6π^5 for every mass ratio tested here. Under the geometric constraint that each expression be a ratio of volumes of elementary bodies, all taken in one and the same dimension, exactly one ratio in the finite search space, with a single term in the denominator, matches its target as closely as 6π^5 matches its own: fp/e ≈ 6π^5 in eleven dimensions. In the end the one merit of this construction is not how well the value agrees, but that 6π^5 alone can be drawn as a single geometrically realizable picture. Drifting each target within its band of measurement uncertainty leaves that verdict unchanged, and the reciprocal of the fine-structure constant, 1/α, stays out of reach even in the vocabulary of length ratios — the form in which α properly appears in physics. Section 7 then lists candidly the fatal problems this construction has as a physical theory, from the disagreement with measurement itself to the absence of Lorentz covariance. Licensing: the paper (this PDF) and the seven figures are licensed under CC BY 4.0. The source code and the data files inside proton_electron_geometry_supplement.zip are licensed under the MIT licence. See the LICENSE file inside that archive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yutaka Akiyama (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: