Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational evaluation demonstrates enhanced fake news detection across multimodal benchmarks, indicating the utility of conflict-driven expert routing.
Purpose Fine-grained multimodal fake news detection requires reasoning over text–image semantic inconsistency and heterogeneous inputs. Existing methods often strengthen fusion or add contextual information but rarely use cross-modal conflict to control multiple inference stages. This study examines whether token-to-patch discrepancy can guide expert processing, contextual interaction and progressive fusion. Design/methodology/approach Multimodal optimal transport semantic alignment with integrated conflict-aware experts (MOSAIC) is a conflict-aware framework. It uses Sinkhorn-regularized optimal transport to estimate token-to-patch mismatch, derive conflict cues for expert processing and fusion, and adaptively route heterogeneous inputs. The same architecture is evaluated on complementary benchmarks FineFake and AMG; dataset-specific choices are limited to preprocessing, class-imbalance handling and auxiliary-context availability. Findings MOSAIC achieves the strongest performance among the compared methods on both benchmarks, improving Macro-F1 by +1.44 points over LLM-MFEFND on FineFake and +2.00 points over MGCA on AMG. Ablation analysis shows a complementary specialization pattern: optimal transport-based conflict modeling contributes most under attribution-level conflict pressure on AMG, whereas adaptive expert routing is most critical under platform-heterogeneous inputs on FineFake. Multi-seed evaluation further confirms stable performance across both settings. Originality/value This study introduces cross-modal semantic conflict as a reusable architectural control signal rather than a local alignment cue. MOSAIC integrates optimal transport-based conflict modeling, adaptive expert routing and conflict-aware progressive fusion into a unified framework, advancing fine-grained multimodal fake news detection through controlled conflict regulation rather than representation augmentation alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: