Qualitative case analysis outlines public service pathways and community promotion strategies for drama education, highlighting mechanisms to equalize aesthetic education.
Against the background of the new era, social aesthetic education has been incorporated into national strategy, and drama education has become an important public service carrier for improving public aesthetic literacy and strengthening community cultural cohesion. Based on social aesthetic education theory, public service theory, community governance theory, and drama education theory, this paper systematically reviews the development status of China’s public service of drama education and analyzes key problems in supply, demand, promotion, and guarantee links. By examining typical cases such as the “Three-Dimensional Collaboration” model of the Central Academy of Drama and the Longfu Outdoor Drama Festival, the study proposes path innovation strategies from four dimensions: supply model, service content, communication channels, and guarantee mechanism. It further designs targeted community promotion plans covering preliminary preparation, implementation, and long-term operation. The research provides theoretical reference and practical guidance for equalizing public cultural services, improving community-level drama education, and realizing the broad popularization of social aesthetic education in the new era.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. Chen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: