Key result
Concomitant statin therapy shows no significant link to greater LDL-C reduction with inclisiran.
Why the study?
Does concomitant statin therapy improve percentage LDL-C reduction in patients treated with inclisiran?
Observational (n=67)
No
Does concomitant statin therapy improve percentage LDL-C reduction in patients treated with inclisiran?
Mean Difference: 33.1 (95% CI -4.6–70.7)
p-value: p=0.085
In a real-world cohort, concomitant statin use was not significantly associated with the overall magnitude of LDL-C reduction during inclisiran therapy, though it may increase the odds of achieving a ≥50% reduction.
Inclisiran lowers LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) by inhibiting hepatic PCSK9 synthesis. Whether concomitant statin therapy modifies the magnitude of inclisiran-associated LDL-C reduction in routine clinical practice remains uncertain. In this retrospective single-center observational study, 67 patients treated with inclisiran for at least 9 months were analyzed. Patients previously treated with PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies were excluded. LDL-C values were assessed longitudinally and stratified by concomitant statin therapy. Multivariable linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate inclisiran-associated percentage LDL-C reduction over time. Thirty-seven patients received concomitant statin therapy and 30 patients did not. Median follow-up was 18 months (IQR 12.5–28). Median LDL-C reduction ranged from approximately − 25% to − 40% across follow-up visits. At 9 months, 10 of 59 patients (16.9%) achieved a ≥ 50% LDL-C reduction. In the primary multivariable longitudinal mixed-effects model, concomitant statin use was not significantly associated with percentage LDL-C reduction (β for no statin vs. statin: 33.1% points; 95% CI − 4.6 to 70.7; p = 0.085). Statin intensity was also not significantly associated with LDL-C reduction (β − 0.11 per percentage point of maximum approved dose; 95% CI − 0.60 to 0.37; p = 0.644). In an exploratory responder analysis, concomitant statin therapy was associated with higher odds of achieving ≥ 50% LDL-C reduction at 9 months (OR 7.69; 95% CI 1.28–45.45; p = 0.026). During follow-up, 18 patients (26.9%) discontinued inclisiran, predominantly due to insufficient LDL-C reduction. In routine clinical practice, neither concomitant statin use nor statin intensity was significantly associated with the magnitude of LDL-C reduction observed during inclisiran therapy. However, responder and attrition sensitivity analyses suggested a possible association between concomitant statin therapy and a more pronounced inclisiran-associated LDL-C response. These findings support the clinical use of inclisiran in heterogeneous real-world populations, while highlighting the potential benefit of maintaining concomitant statin therapy whenever tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seidel et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Patients treated with inclisiran (n=67). No concomitant statin therapy vs. Concomitant statin therapy was evaluated on Percentage LDL-C reduction over time (β 33.1 percentage points, 95% CI -4.6 to 70.7, p=0.085). In patients receiving inclisiran, lack of concomitant statin therapy was not significantly associated with percentage LDL-C reduction (β 33.1 percentage points; 95% CI -4.6 to 70.7; p=0.085).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: