Difference-in-differences analysis reveals value-added tax credit refunds improve total factor productivity in listed manufacturing firms, indicating critical roles for targeted fiscal support.
This paper re-examines the effects of incremental and stock value-added tax (VAT) credit refunds on enterprise total factor productivity (TFP). Based on updated panel data from Shanghai and Shenzhen listed companies covering both the incremental-refund window and the stock-refund window, a difference-in-differences (DID) model is used to identify average productivity effects. The results show that both refund policies significantly improve corporate TFP, and the updated estimates support the interpretation that tax refunds operate through R&D investment, financing constraints, productive investment, and firm-level absorptive capacity. The effects vary across regions and firms: fiscal pressure, marketization, profitability, growth, ownership, and innovation-related capacity help explain heterogeneous responses. To connect DID estimates with firm-level heterogeneity, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost models are further applied. Feature-importance and SHAP analyses show that ROA, ownership, growth, leverage, capital expenditure, financing constraints, and intangible assets are key predictors of policy response. The findings provide evidence for precision-oriented fiscal policy and are relevant to capital-intensive advanced manufacturing sectors, including optical communication and electromagnetic equipment industries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: