Experimental evaluation demonstrates high-accuracy physiological monitoring and reduced injury rates in athletic training, highlighting the viability of smart textiles for wearable health systems.
Textile-based smart sensing technologies have emerged as a promising platform for continuous physiological monitoring and wireless information acquisition in wearable systems, offering significant potential for intelligent healthcare and human-centered electromagnetic sensing applications. This study systematically investigates the monitoring technologies and application effectiveness of textile-based smart sensing equipment in sports training scenarios by integrating flexible conductive materials, multimodal signal acquisition, wireless transmission, and data fusion strategies into a unified health monitoring framework. A comprehensive evaluation system covering physiological status, movement posture, and environmental adaptation is established to assess monitoring performance under representative speed skating and soccer training conditions. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed textile-based sensing system achieves heart rate monitoring errors below 3%, joint angle measurement errors below 2.5%, and superior real-time responsiveness compared with conventional monitoring approaches, while improving training optimization efficiency by more than 30% and reducing sports injury incidence by approximately 50%. In addition, the developed three-dimensional evaluation framework effectively quantifies technical performance, application adaptability, and practical value across different training scenarios. The proposed methodology provides a scalable solution for wearable intelligent sensing and offers valuable references for flexible electromagnetic sensing systems, body-area communication networks, and next-generation smart textiles requiring reliable signal acquisition and robust data transmission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: