Observational platform study reveals that female investors attract less follow-up funding while spurring female participation, suggesting gender bias and homophily shape crowdfunding dynamics.
This study seeks to gain a better understanding of equity crowdfunding. The role of gender in equity crowdfunding matters from the investor perspective, given the mutual observability and underlying social mechanisms of collective action that inform investment decisions. We show that gender cues are associated with how subsequent investors respond to past investments. Specifically, female investors seem to attract less follow-up funding relative to their male counterparts but also elicit more female participation. Based on ~68,000 investments covering 6.5 years of activity on Companisto (one of Europe’s leading equity crowdfunding platforms), our results indicate gender bias against and homophily among women. We find that expert badges and profile photos moderate this effect, suggesting that also perceptions of gender role congruity are at play. In addition, results indicate gender differences with respect to investment preferences, financial commitment, and user representation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaouat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: