Multicenter diagnostic study demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy of a three-gene urinary DNA methylation assay for endometrial cancer, indicating potential for noninvasive early detection.
Endometrial cancer (EC) incidence is rising globally, yet diagnosis still depends on invasive procedures, which limit accessibility and delay early detection. A noninvasive, accurate, and accessible diagnostic assay is urgently needed to enable early EC detection. In this multicenter diagnostic study across six hospitals in China (May 2021 - May 2026), we integrated whole-epigenome methylation profiling of 1,211 datasets followed by targeted bisulfite sequencing of 367 samples to identify EC-specific urine DNA methylation biomarkers. A qPCR-based urinary methylation assay (Urine-qEC) targeting three genes, VWC2 , ZNF132 , and ZSCAN12 , was subsequently developed and validated in a cross-sectional multicenter cohort ( n = 587). Urine hypermethylation signatures exhibited concordance with EC tumors and significantly diminished after tumor resection. The Urine-qEC assay achieved an AUC of 0.976 (89.4% sensitivity, 97.0% specificity) in the training cohort and 0.938 (85.5% sensitivity, 91.1% specificity) in the multicenter validation, with ZSCAN12 being the main contributor ( ZSCAN12 alone led to an AUC of 0.961 and 0.928, respectively). Sensitivity remained high across clinical stages—84.2% sensitivity for stage I ( n = 165, 68.8% of cases), 87.9% for stage II, and 94.4% for advanced-stage (III/IV) (92.2% specificity). Specificity was consistent across control subgroups, reaching 93.0% against symptomatic controls with abnormal uterine bleeding and 91.0% against benign controls. The Urine-qEC assay demonstrates the technical feasibility of a urine-based methylation approach for noninvasive endometrial cancer detection. These findings support further prospective validation in larger, diverse populations to establish clinical utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: