Techno-economic modeling reveals optimal scale and viability for hybrid compressed air and solar storage, indicating strong promise in sunny industrial regions.
This study assesses the novel integration of Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) with high-temperature air-based Concentrated Solar Power (CSP), enabling both electricity storage and generation, as well as supplying medium-temperature waste heat to nearby industrial processes. The proposed system is analyzed for a Chilean case study using detailed annual simulations and an updated techno-economic framework. A parametric analysis is conducted for plant sizes ranging from 1 to 400 MW e , including optimization of key design and operational variables. Results reveal a pronounced dependence of economic performance on plant scale, identifying that a 100 MW e plant achieves the most attractive economics under base-case assumptions, with an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 5.6% and a Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) of 125 USD/MWh e . Sensitivity analyses further examine the influence of electricity price fluctuations and cost-reduction pathways, highlighting the critical importance of waste heat recovery. Comparative benchmarking against alternative storage solutions — adiabatic CAES (A-CAES), CSP with an electric heater, and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) — demonstrates that the competitiveness of energy storage is highly context-dependent: no single technology consistently outperforms others across all scales and market conditions. While the IRR of CAES-CSP is slightly below the assumed discount rate under base-case assumptions, the proposed configuration shows particular promise for large-scale deployment in regions with high solar irradiance, significant electricity price variability, and nearby industrial heat demand. These results provide quantitative guidance for the design and deployment of CAES-CSP systems, positioning the technology as a potential solution for supporting the energy transition in specific use cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baigorri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: