Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 16, 2026British Journal of HaematologyOpen Access

Janus kinase inhibitors after ruxolitinib failure in myelofibrosis: A systematic review and pooled analysis of phase 3 efficacy and integrated safety across clinical trials and real‐world evidence

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ADAndrea DuminucoPHPatrick HarringtonETElena Torre

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Systematic review reveals distinct efficacy and safety profiles for second-line Janus kinase inhibitors in myelofibrosis, suggesting treatment should be tailored to patient phenotypes.

Key Points

  • To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of second-line Janus kinase inhibitors (fedratinib, momelotinib, and pacritinib) in patients with myelofibrosis who failed ruxolitinib.
  • Systematic search and pooled analysis of phase 3 clinical trials assessing efficacy (spleen volume reduction and total symptom score reduction at week 24).
  • Integrated safety analysis combining phase 2/3 trials (n = 1004) and real-world evidence cohorts (n = 790, including five momelotinib cohorts of n = 580).
  • Pooled ≥35% spleen volume reduction at week 24 was 32.7% (95% CI 27.3–38.6) for fedratinib, 15.8% (95% CI 11.7–21.0) for momelotinib, and 21.6% (95% CI 13.8–32.3) for pacritinib 200 mg twice daily; pooled ≥50% Total Symptom Score reduction was 32.8% (95% CI 27.4–38.7), 25.3% (95% CI 20.2–31.3), and 32.4% (95% CI 22.9–43.7), respectively.
  • Safety profiles differed: fedratinib had the highest grade ≥3 anaemia (34.3%) and diarrhoea (56.6%), pacritinib had the highest grade ≥3 bleeding (11.2%), and momelotinib showed the lowest grade ≥3 anaemia (8.0%) but real-world nephrotoxicity (17%–29%) and peripheral neuropathy (4%–20%).
  • Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were similar across all agents at approximately 16% to 17%.

Cite This Study

Duminuco et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a817ab4f2fb91fc834aeb41https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70754
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparative efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitor-based strategies in JAK inhibitor-naïve myelofibrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis2026
  2. 2Momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis: an efficacy/safety analysis in the Japanese subgroup of the phase 3 randomized SIMPLIFY-1 trial2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Advances in Myelofibrosis Management: New Janus Kinase Inhibitors Beyond Ruxolitinib2024
  4. 4Momelotinib versus Continued Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy in JAK Inhibitor-Experienced Patients with Myelofibrosis and Anemia: Subgroup Analysis of SIMPLIFY-22024 · 17 citations
  5. 5Matching‐Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Gecacitinib, Fedratinib, Pacritinib, and Momelotinib in Second‐Line Myelofibrosis Therapy2026