Longitudinal cohort study reveals reduced functional brain network energy in preterm youth, highlighting persistent neurodevelopmental delays that impair crystallized cognition.
Preterm birth disrupts early brain development, increasing the risk of cognitive difficulties. However, its long-term effects on functional brain network energy, a metric of large-scale network stability and adaptability, remain poorly understood. Using resting-state fMRI data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, we examined how prematurity influences brain network energy across late childhood and early adolescence. Our sample included 818 preterm-born youth and 2,149 matched full-term controls. Compared to full-term adolescents, preterm individuals exhibited altered multiscale functional connectivity and persistent reductions in functional network energy, specifically within the sensorimotor (SM) and higher-cognitive temporoparietal (HC-TP) networks, at both baseline and 2-year follow-up. These findings suggest diminished functional flexibility and network integration in preterm-born individuals. To further contextualize these results, we incorporated data from 1,633 participants in the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and HCP-Development studies, confirming that network energy increases with age in typically developing youth and is consistently reduced in preterm individuals. Notably, lower energy in the HC-TP network was specifically associated with deficits in crystallized cognition, but not with behavioral problems. Meta-analytic decoding further linked the HC-TP network to language and social cognition, providing a mechanistic explanation for its relationship with crystallized cognitive abilities. These findings highlight the persistence of neurodevelopmental alterations in preterm individuals, particularly affecting higher-order cognitive functions, and position network energy as a potential marker of altered neurodevelopment following preterm birth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: