Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Yoga burns visibly fewer calories per hour than running, yet a consistent body of research finds that regular yoga practice supports meaningful, sustained weight loss, particularly around the abdomen. This article resolves that apparent contradiction in plain, story-led terms for a general reader, not a clinical one. It traces the actual mechanism: chronic stress elevates cortisol, and cortisol specifically drives abdominal fat storage regardless of calorie intake; a randomized trial found restorative yoga, one of the gentlest styles, produced more than double the fat loss of plain stretching, an effect researchers attribute to cortisol reduction rather than exertion. It covers yoga's link to improved insulin sensitivity, and the behavioural shift researchers consistently find matters most: learning to distinguish genuine hunger from stress or boredom eating. It places this alongside Ayurveda's classical explanation, weakened Agni (digestive fire) and aggravated Kapha, a framework recorded in the Charaka Samhita over 1,500 years ago that maps closely onto what modern metabolic research now measures separately. It closes with an honest account of what yoga cannot do, no spot-reduction, no calorie-burn miracle, and practical guidance for getting started.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narayan Rout (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: