Why the study?
Ultrasonography is promising for detecting disease activity and tissue damage in juvenile dermatomyositis, but few studies have evaluated muscle elastography.
Can ultrasound and muscle elastography differentiate Juvenile Dermatomyositis patients from healthy controls and associate with clinical assessments?
Can ultrasound and muscle elastography differentiate Juvenile Dermatomyositis patients from healthy controls and associate with clinical assessments?
Gray scale and Power Doppler ultrasonography can help differentiate Juvenile Dermatomyositis patients from healthy controls and detect disease activity, whereas Strain Elastography does not.
Gray-scale US may aid JDM differentiation; leaves open strain elastography utility pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common idiopathic inflammatory myopathy in children. Imaging exams are useful for muscle assessment, with ultrasonography (US) being a promising tool in detecting disease activity and tissue damage. There are few studies about muscle elastography. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to associate clinical, laboratory, and nailfold capillaroscopy (NC) assessments with US in JDM patients; and to compare the findings of US and Strain Elastography (SE) from patients and healthy controls. METHODS: An analytic cross-sectional study was performed with JDM patients and healthy controls. Patients underwent clinical exam to access muscle strength and completed questionnaires about global assessment of the disease and functional capacity. Patients were submitted to NC and measurement of muscle enzymes. All subjects underwent US assessment, using gray scale, Power Doppler (PD), and SE. RESULTS: Twenty-two JDM patients and fourteen controls, aged between 5 and 21 years, matched for age and sex were assessed. In qualitative and semi-quantitative gray scale, we observed a higher frequency of alterations in patients (p < 0.001), while in PD, there was a higher frequency of positivity in patients' deltoids and anterior tibialis (p < 0.001). Active disease was associated with an important change in the semi-quantitative gray scale in deltoids (p = 0.007), biceps brachii (p = 0.001) and quadriceps femoris (p = 0.005). The SE demonstrated a high negative predictive value of 87.2. CONCLUSION: US was able, through gray scale, to differentiate JDM patients from controls, while PD achieved such differentiation only for deltoids and anterior tibialis. The semi-quantitative gray scale showed disease activity in proximal muscles. SE was not able to differentiate patients from controls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrade et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: