Key result
Preoperative adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation level (APAL) values were significantly higher in patients who developed ischemic complications after flow diverter implantation (p=0.024).
Why the study?
Platelet reactivity is associated with perioperative complications during flow diverter implantation, but the utility of the adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation level scoring system required evaluation.
Does the APAL scoring system predict ischemic complications in patients undergoing flow diverter implantation for cerebral aneurysms?
Observational (n=47)
No
Does the APAL scoring system predict ischemic complications in patients undergoing flow diverter implantation for cerebral aneurysms?
The APAL scoring system is a fully automated test that correlates with PRU and may be useful for predicting ischemic complications during flow diverter implantation.
APAL may aid ischemic risk stratification in flow diverter cases; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Objective Platelet reactivity is associated with perioperative complications during flow diverter (FD) implantation. Our study aimed to evaluate the association between adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation level (APAL) a platelet reactivity scoring system using light transmission methods and ischemic complications after FD implantation. Methods This retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent FD implantation for cerebral aneurysms between September 2020 and December 2023 at our institution and who were taking two or more antiplatelet agents before the procedure. Platelet reactivity was assessed using APAL scoring and VerifyNow, with evaluations conducted preoperatively, 1–3 days postoperatively, 1 month postoperatively, and at the time of ischemic complications. Results Ischemic complications occurred in four patients (8.5 %). The correlation coefficient between APAL and the P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) measured over the entire period was r = 0.553 ( p < 0.001). Preoperative APAL values were significantly high in patients with ischemic complications ( p = 0.024). The optimal cutoff APAL value calculated from the receiver operating characteristic curve, was 6.6. The APAL system exhibited a moderate correlation with PRU measurements. Conclusion As a fully automated test, APAL is characterized by fewer manual errors than conventional methods. Therefore, APAL may be useful for evaluating antiplatelet function during FD implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shoda et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Cerebral aneurysms (n=47). Adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation level (APAL) was evaluated on Ischemic complications (p=0.024). Preoperative adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation level (APAL) values were significantly higher in patients who developed ischemic complications after flow diverter implantation (p=0.024).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: