Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When facing the political, historical and cultural complexities of Mainland China, Hong Kong Taiwan, problematic issues arise in relation to understanding the sorts of national/cultural that might be projected by them. With regard to these three Chinese language , a traditional national cinema approach focussing predominantly upon nation-state as source of meaning would provide only a limited understanding of the meanings generated. article, however, draws on what Benedict Anderson (1991) put forward as the theory of ‘Imagined Communities’ which assumes a large body of people regard themselves as members a ‘nation’ (and here we interpret this term broadly and beyond understandings of geographical borders and political systems) through a variety of historical legacies, cultural memories and acts of consumption. In this article we hold the assumption that there is a shared cultural meaning (namely ‘Chineseness’) that extends across the three Chinese language cinemas and consider cultural affinity as greater than national and political boundaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: