Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of adjunct micro-interventional pre-treatment for nucleus disassembly on the surgical efficiency of non-cavitating lensectomy during cataract surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 12 surgeons performed 512 consecutive cataract extractions using a sonic cavitation-free lensectomy with or without adjunct pre-treatment for nucleus disassembly. There were 2 interventional arms including (1) lensectomy without adjunct pre-treatment and (2) lensectomy with micro-interventional miLOOP pre-treatment. RESULTS: Successful lensectomy was achieved in all eyes using cavitation-free sonic lensectomy. Average baseline cataract density was 2.28 and 2.39 in the three groups, respectively. Compared to no pre-treatment, nucleus evacuation time was 24% (p = < 0.001) faster with micro-interventional nucleus disassembly. Irrigation/aspiration (I/A) time was 14% faster with the micro-interventional pre-treatment (p = < 0.001). Irrigation fluid use was 24% less with micro-interventional. There was a low rate of capsular tear of 1 case across 512 cases with no other unanticipated complications. CONCLUSION: Micro-interventional pre-treatment for nucleus disassembly was associated with improved lensectomy time and fluidic efficiency compared to no pre-treatment. Non-cavitating lensectomy with the miCOR lens pen achieved effective fragmentation and extraction in all grades of cataract.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ianchulev et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: