Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Small-firm development can be considered as an essential aspect of the Italian adjustment to economic and social tensions in the last decade. While the role of a particular social context (extended family, local community, rural-urban interpenetration) in this pattern of economic growth has been widely recognized, less attention has been drawn to the local political system. The most typical small-firm regions are characterized by distinctive political subcultures: the Communist one in the central regions and the Catholic/Christian-Democratic one in the north-eastern areas. The paper argues that political subcultures favoured a localist regulation of the small-firm economy through their influence on industrial relations and the activity of local governments. On these bases, a social compromise was established, which brought about high levels of economic flexibility. Unions and local governments mitigated the social costs of economic adjustments in the industrial districts and fostered a local redistribution of the benefits accruing from economic growth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlo Trigilia (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: