This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Childhood asthma is a major public health concern. Current evidence regarding vitamin D supplementation in childhood asthma remains inconsistent, particularly with respect to pulmonary function. This study comprehensively evaluates the role of vitamin D supplementation in childhood asthma, with a particular focus on lung function. Method: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched through October 31, 2025 for RCTs. Data were extracted and analyzed using FEV1 (%) as the primary outcome measure, and FVC (%), FEV1/FVC, PEF, FeNO, cACT, and IgE as secondary outcome measures. Results: = 1239) were included. We did not find evidence that vitamin D supplementation improves lung function [FEV1 (%): SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.92; FVC (%): SMD: 0.13, 95% CI: -0.73 to 0.98; FEV1/FVC: MD: 0.56, 95% CI: -7.24 to 8.35; PEF: MD: -3.69, 95% CI: -9.71 to 2.34] or cACT scores (MD: 0.16, 95% CI: -0.55 to 0.88), nor does it reduce FeNO or IgE levels (SMD: -0.14, 95% CI: -0.61 to 0.33) in children with asthma. Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation showed no overall benefit for lung function, IgE levels, FeNO, or cACT scores in children with asthma. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251270660.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: