This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The apparent discrepancy between the values (1.45×10^-13A1/3 cm) for the nuclear radii derived from mirror nuclei and those (1.2×10^-13A1/3 cm) derived from μ-mesonic atoms was investigated. The conventional calculation of the Coulomb energy difference ΔEc between mirror nuclei is improved in two respects: the usual uniform model is replaced by the more elaborate shell model with a finite square well potential, and the exchange terms are taken into account. An equivalent Coulomb radius Rc is defined by Rc=(6/5) (Ze²ΔEc); an equivalent meson radius is defined by RM=(5/3)1/2〈r²〉Av1/2, where 〈r²〉Av1/2 is the mean square radius of the electrical charge distribution. The two extreme cases of the pairs (F¹⁷, O¹⁷) and (O¹⁵, N¹⁵) are investigated. The computation gives RcRM=1.18 in O¹⁷, RcRM=1.07 in N¹⁵. These results are smaller by about 8 percent than the experimental ratios. However, the experimental discontinuity in Rc at the closure of the p shell is reproduced.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. Jancovici (1954) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: