Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The differential scattering cross section for electron-electron scattering has been measured at relativistic energies. A focused beam of 15.7-Mev monokinetic electrons from the 22-Mev betatron was scattered by 1- and 2-mil Nylon foils in a 20-inch scattering chamber. The incident current was collected by a faraday cage after it had passed through the scattering foil and was measured by a vibrating reed electrometer. The scattered beam was defined by gold-lined slits at a known angle to the incident beam. The number of scattered electrons in a given momentum interval chosen by a magnetic analyzer was counted by a Geiger counter.Energy analysis of the scattered electrons made it possible to separate the nuclear scattering events from the electron scattering events. The energy of the scattered electrons was measured as a function of the scattering angle and was found to be in agreement with the laws of relativistic mechanics within an experimental accuracy of 0.4 percent.For the electron-electron collisions the relative scattering cross sections agree with the M{}ller formula. For the electron-nuclear collisions they agree with the relativistic Mott theory (Born approximation) corrected for the radiative losses as calculated by Schwinger (3 to 8 percent). The experimental consistency of the cross sections was about 4 percent.The absolute differential scattering cross sections for the electron-nuclear scattering were measured at angles between 10^∘{} and 43^∘{}. The average of the absolute values was 2 percent lower than theory. This is probably due to systematic errors in the solid angle, and in the collection and counting efficiencies.The absolute differential scattering cross sections for electron-electron scattering were measured at the same set of angles, which correspond to the angular interval of 70^∘{} to 150^∘{} in the center-of-mass system. The average of these absolute cross sections was 7 percent lower than theory predicts. The bulk of the 5 percent additional departure from theory may be due to a systematic error in the measurement of the momentum interval defined by the counter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scott et al. (1951) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: