Key result
A binary tree model using inferior vena cava pulsatility indexes achieved 78.0% accuracy in identifying patient volume status, superior to standard M-mode ultrasound methods.
Why the study?
Non-invasive volume status assessment via IVC echography is promising, but its clinical utility is limited by the poor reproducibility of standard procedures.
Does an automated algorithm using IVC pulsatility indexes improve the accuracy of volume status assessment compared to standard M-mode ultrasound in patients with normal respiratory and cardiac function?
Observational (n=50)
Does an automated algorithm using IVC pulsatility indexes improve the accuracy of volume status assessment compared to standard M-mode ultrasound in patients with normal respiratory and cardiac function?
Automated extraction of IVC pulsatility indexes from B-mode ultrasound video-clips provides a more accurate assessment of volume status than standard M-mode measurements in patients with normal sinus rhythm and respiratory function.
May support automated IVC analysis for volume assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Assessment of volume status is important to correctly plan the treatment of patients admitted and managed by cardiology, emergency and internal medicine departments. Non-invasive assessment of volume status by echography of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is a promising possibility, but its clinical use is limited by poor reproducibility of current standard procedures. We have developed new algorithms to extract reliable information from non-invasive IVC monitoring by ultrasound (US) imaging. Both long and short axis US B-mode video-clips were taken from 50 patients, in either hypo-, eu-, or hyper-volemic conditions. The video-clips were processed to extract static and dynamic indexes characterizing the IVC behaviour. Different binary tree models (BTM) were developed to identify patient conditions on the basis of those indexes. The best classifier was a BTM using IVC pulsatility indexes as input features. Its accuracy (78.0% when tested with a leave-one-out approach) is superior to that achieved using indexes measured by the standard clinical method from M-mode US recordings. These results were obtained with patients in conditions of normal respiratory function and cardiac rhythm. Further studies are necessary to extend this approach to patients with more complex cardio-respiratory conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mesin et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Volume status (hypo-, eu-, or hyper-volemia) (n=50). Binary tree model using IVC pulsatility indexes vs. Standard clinical method from M-mode US recordings was evaluated on Accuracy in identifying patient volume conditions. A binary tree model using inferior vena cava pulsatility indexes achieved 78.0% accuracy in identifying patient volume status, superior to standard M-mode ultrasound methods.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: