Why the study?
Does patient self-management improve time in therapeutic range compared to patient self-testing in patients on long-term warfarin?
Does patient self-management improve time in therapeutic range compared to patient self-testing in patients on long-term warfarin?
Patient self-management and patient self-testing of oral anticoagulation provide similar time in therapeutic range, both of which may be superior to conventional clinic management.
PSM offers no TTR advantage over PST; confirms equivalence and supports either self-monitoring approach over conventional care.
Several studies suggest that patient self-management (PSM) may improve the quality of oral anticoagulation therapy as measured by time spent within the international normalised ratio (INR) target range. We performed a prospective randomised control trial to determine whether the improvement in quality of treatment afforded by PSM is greater than that achieved by patient self-testing (PST) alone. A total of 104 of 800 eligible patients aged 22-88 years (median = 59.8), attending our hospital anticoagulant clinic and receiving long-term warfarin for >8 months agreed to participate. Patients were randomised to PSM (n = 55) or PST (n = 49). Both groups measured their INR using the CoaguChek S every 2 weeks or more frequently if required, for a period of 6 months. Seventy-seven of 104 (74%) patients completed the study (PSM = 41 and PST = 36). The 'drop out' rates for both groups were similar. There was no significant difference between the percentage time in target therapeutic range for PSM (69.9%) and PST (71.8%). Both groups combined showed a significant improvement over the previous 6 months (71.0% vs. 62.5%; P = 0.04). Changes in time within the therapeutic range in individual patients (+5.86) also showed a significant difference. The quality of warfarin control in both PST and PSM may be superior to that achieved by conventional management in a specialised hospital anticoagulation clinic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gardiner et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: