Key result
Chewing a 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor led to a non-significant reduction in platelet reactivity at 1 hour compared to swallowing (median PRU 143 vs 210, P=0.09).
Why the study?
Time to achieve adequate platelet inhibition after swallowing a P2Y12 inhibitor loading dose varies significantly, and data on whether chewed ticagrelor allows more rapid platelet inhibition in patients with stable ischemic heart disease or NSTE-ACS are less robust.
Does chewing a ticagrelor loading dose improve platelet inhibition at 1 hour compared to swallowing in P2Y12-naïve patients undergoing PCI for SIHD or NSTE-ACS?
RCT (n=112)
Open-label
1:1
No
Does chewing a ticagrelor loading dose improve platelet inhibition at 1 hour compared to swallowing in P2Y12-naïve patients undergoing PCI for SIHD or NSTE-ACS?
Chewing a ticagrelor loading dose may provide slightly faster platelet inhibition than swallowing in patients undergoing PCI, particularly in those with stable ischemic heart disease, without increasing bleeding or MACE.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chewing ticagrelor does not significantly accelerate platelet inhibition at 1 hour; leaves open faster onset in larger PCI trials.
Purpose: Dual antiplatelet therapy is standard for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stents. Traditionally, patients swallow the loading dose of a P2Y12 inhibitor before or during PCI. Time to achieve adequate platelet inhibition after swallowing the loading dose varies significantly. Chewed tablets may allow more rapid inhibition of platelet aggregation. However, data for this strategy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are less robust. Methods: In this single-center prospective trial, 112 P2Y12-naïve patients with stable ischemic heart disease or NSTE-ACS on aspirin therapy and who received ticagrelor after coronary angiography but before PCI were randomized to chewing (n = 55) or swallowing (n = 57) the ticagrelor loading dose (180 mg). Baseline variables were compared using 2-sample t-test and chi-squared/Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate, with alpha set at 0.05. P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) were compared at baseline, 1 hour, and 4 hours using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Patients then received standard ticagrelor dosing. Results: After exclusions, P2Y12 PRU in the chewed and swallowed groups at baseline, 1 hour, and 4 hours after ticagrelor loading dose were 243 vs 256 (P = 0.75), 143 vs 210 (P = 0.09), and 28 vs 25 (P = 0.89), respectively. No differences were found in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) or major bleeding at 30 days and 1 year. Conclusions: In patients with stable ischemic heart disease or NSTE-ACS, chewing rather than swallowing ticagrelor may lead to slightly faster inhibition of platelet aggregation at 1 hour with no increase in MACE or major bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Stable ischemic heart disease or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (n=112). Ticagrelor (chewed) vs. Ticagrelor (swallowed) was evaluated on Residual platelet reactivity by P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) at 1 hour (Cohen's d 0.39, p=0.09). Chewing a 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor led to a non-significant reduction in platelet reactivity at 1 hour compared to swallowing (median PRU 143 vs 210, P=0.09).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: