Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The geometry, η 3 ⇄ η 1 conversion, and reductive elimination of a palladium(II) η 3 -allyl hydride complex and its platinum(II) analogue, MH(η 3 -C 3 H 5 )(PH 3 ) ( 1 ) (M = Pd, Pt), are theoretically investigated with ab initio MO/MP4, SD-CI, and coupled cluster double substitution (CCD) methods. In 1, the M−C bond trans-positioned to H(hydride) is much longer than the other M−C bond, while the C−C bond trans-positioned to H is considerably shorter than the other C−C bond, due to the strong trans-influence of H. Nevertheless, the two C−C bonds of the allyl ligand are conjugated well with each other, and 1 is still considered as an η 3 -allyl complex. The η 1 -isomer, MH(η 1 -C 3 H 5 )(PH 3 ) ( 2 ), is less stable than 1 by 8.6 kcal/mol for M = Pd and 13.0 kcal/mol for M = Pt at the MP4SDQ level (MP4SDQ and SD-CI calculations yield similar energy differences). The C−H reductive elimination of PdH(η 3 -C 3 H 5 )(PH 3 ) proceeds with a much lower activation energy ( E a ) of 5.4 kcal/mol and a significantly higher exothermicity ( E exo ) of 29.4 kcal/mol than those of the Pt analogue ( E a = 20.9 kcal/mol and E exo = 11.1 kcal/mol), where the MP4SDQ values are given. This C−H reductive elimination of 1 requires a somewhat higher E a than that of MH(CH 3 )(PH 3 ). These results are interpreted in terms of bond energies. Changes in bonding characteristics caused by this reductive elimination are discussed in detail, on the basis of orbital mixing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakaki et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: