High temperature annealing of 4H- or 6H-SiC(0001) crystals is well known to desorb Si from the surface and to generate a C-rich (63×63)R30^∘ (63) reconstruction explained as a graphite monolayer in heteroepitaxial registry with the substrate. Ge deposition at room temperature and in the monolayer range on this graphitized reconstruction results in Ge islands. Using a number of surface techniques, we follow subsequent Ge morphology evolutions as a function of isochronal post-annealing treatments at increasing temperatures. In a particular temperature window Ge reacts with the substrate by diffusion under the graphite planes and wets the Si-terminated SiC surface. In spite of this bidimensional insertion of a Ge layer, the epitaxial relationship between the SiC substrate and the graphite is maintained as shown by very clear graphite-(1×1) LEED or RHEED patterns. They denote extended and well-ordered graphite planes at the surface of a graphite/Ge∕SiC heterostructure. XPS analyses reveal a complete passivation of the intercalated Ge layer against oxidation by the overlying graphite sheets. Moreover, drastic spectroscopic changes on the bulk-SiC Si0.2em0ex2p and C0.2em0ex1s core levels are observed, depending on whether graphite(63)∕SiC or graphite(1×1)∕Ge∕SiC terminations are analyzed. In the latter case, the observed core level splitting of the bulk components is interpreted by a significant upward band bending (~1.20.3em0exeV) of the n-doped SiC, making this second interface to act as a Schottky barrier. Above 13000.2em0ex^∘C, a delayed Ge desorption takes place that allows the graphite sheets to re-form in their initial 63 form, i.e., without Ge and with flatter bands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
K�ubler et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: