Key result
Percutaneous catheter-based radiofrequency ablation via the renal arteries decreases blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension and is largely free of significant complications.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous catheter-based radiofrequency ablation decrease blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension?
Does percutaneous catheter-based radiofrequency ablation decrease blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension?
Catheter-based renal denervation is a promising and generally safe procedure for reducing blood pressure in resistant hypertension, though long-term data are needed.
May support renal denervation in resistant hypertension; leaves open the need for long-term randomized confirmation before practice change.
Hypertension is a common disease associated with important cardiovascular complications. Persistent blood pressure of 140/90 or higher despite combined use of a reninangiotensin system blocker, calcium channel blocker and a diuretic at highest tolerated doses constitutes resistant hypertension. Excess sympathetic activity plays an important pathogenic role in resistant hypertension in addition to contributing to the development of metabolic problems, in particular diabetes. Reduction of renal sympathetic activity by percutaneous catheter-based radiofrequency ablation via the renal arteries has been shown in several studies to decrease blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension, and importantly is largely free of significant complications. However, longer term follow-up is required to confirm both long-term safety and efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hatipoglu et al. (2013) conducted a review in Resistant hypertension. Percutaneous catheter-based radiofrequency ablation via the renal arteries was evaluated on Blood pressure reduction. Percutaneous catheter-based radiofrequency ablation via the renal arteries decreases blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension and is largely free of significant complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: