Spatial modeling demonstrates that integrating soil erosion sensitivity alters ecological corridor configurations, highlighting key restoration priorities in fragile landscapes.
Ecological security patterns are widely used to support ecological restoration planning in fragile regions, but commonly used resistance-surface approaches often fail to sufficiently account for erosion-related landscape instability in the Loess Plateau. Herein, we developed a planning-oriented ecological security pattern for Linfen, China, by identifying ecological sources using an ecosystem health index and incorporating soil erosion sensitivity as a regional modifier of the ecological resistance surface. Using Linkage Mapper and circuit theory, we extracted modeled ecological corridors, high-current–density pinch points, and candidate barrier areas for restoration priority under an erosion-sensitive resistance scenario, and then compared these outputs with those derived from the baseline resistance surface. The erosion-sensitive scenario yielded 814.22 km of modeled ecological corridors, together with high-current–density pinch points and restoration-priority barrier areas. Incorporating soil erosion sensitivity altered the spatial configuration of corridors and priority areas, indicating that erosion-prone terrain can alter modeled structural connectivity in the Loess Plateau. These outputs should be interpreted as scenario-based structural-connectivity results rather than as independently validated species-movement pathways. Through distinguishing priority areas where ecological connectivity improvement overlaps erosion-sensitive terrain, the results can help align territorial spatial zoning, ecological restoration actions, and soil erosion-control measures in Linfen. This study provides a spatially explicit planning reference for ecological restoration screening and corridor-planning prioritization in the city of Linfen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: