Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative survey reveals forensic evidence gaps and cultural barriers in witchcraft adjudication among justice personnel, highlighting the need for specialized infrastructure.
Adjudicating witchcraft-related cases presents a formidable challenge due to the difficulty of procuring technical evidence for claims rooted in supernatural beliefs. This study examines these complexities through the lenses of forensic science and Cultural Deviance Theory, using a quantitative descriptive survey of 204 justice-sector personnel in Kwara State, Nigeria. Findings reveal that witchcraft beliefs significantly influence crime reporting and court processes, while the absence of physical evidence and fear of community backlash hinder prosecution. Respondents strongly affirmed that forensic evidence can prevent wrongful punishment, though its use is severely limited by a lack of facilities. The study concludes that a disconnect exists between the empirical demands of the justice system and the socio-cultural realities of witchcraft beliefs. It recommends specialized training, investment in forensic infrastructure, and culturally informed protocols to ensure fair adjudication
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: