Key result
Participation in the Heart School educational program after acute myocardial infarction was associated with increased smoking cessation (adjusted OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.46-2.78).
Why the study?
Does participation in a post-AMI educational program ('Heart School') improve the achievement of secondary prevention goals in patients treated for acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=2,822)
Yes
Does participation in a post-AMI educational program ('Heart School') improve the achievement of secondary prevention goals in patients treated for acute myocardial infarction?
Odds Ratio: 2.01 (95% CI 1.46–2.78)
A post-AMI educational program in routine care significantly improved smoking cessation rates but was insufficient to obtain sustainable changes in other lifestyle factors or clinical outcomes.
May support Heart School for smoking cessation post-AMI; leaves open broader secondary prevention effects in observational data.
BACKGROUND: Modification of risk factors such as smoking, obesity, physical inactivity, and hypertension after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity. Therefore, most hospitals in Sweden invite patients with myocardial infarction to an educational program, the "Heart School," where they can learn about lifestyle changes. Whether this kind of education program applied in routine care increases the proportion of patients achieving secondary prevention goals is unknown. METHODS: A cohort of consecutive patients treated for AMI and included in a quality registry was followed up during 1 year. The main aim was to study the effects of taking part in the Heart School on smoking habits, blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, exercise habits, cardiac symptoms, quality of life, and readmissions to hospital. Patients included in the national quality register of secondary prevention after AMI who had participated in the educational program were compared with those who had not participated in the program. Achievements of secondary prevention goals 1 year after the myocardial infarction were evaluated. The study included 2,822 patients. RESULTS: The result showed that patients who participated in the Heart School stopped smoking more often than those who did not participate (adjusted odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-2.78). The Heart School had no effects on the other variables that were examined. CONCLUSION: The interventions currently used in the Swedish Heart School seem to be insufficient to obtain sustainable lifestyle changes, except for smoking cessation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellman et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in acute myocardial infarction (n=2,822). Heart School educational program vs. No participation in the Heart School program was evaluated on Smoking cessation (adjusted OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.46-2.78). Participation in the Heart School educational program after acute myocardial infarction was associated with increased smoking cessation (adjusted OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.46-2.78).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: