Why the study?
Guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in paediatric urology are lacking, and its use often depends on institutional opinions rather than evidence-based rules.
Does surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis prevent bacteraemia, SSIs, and ppUTIs in paediatric patients undergoing urologic procedures?
Does surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis prevent bacteraemia, SSIs, and ppUTIs in paediatric patients undergoing urologic procedures?
This consensus document provides recommendations for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in pediatric urology, emphasizing that clean procedures generally do not require prophylaxis while clean-contaminated ones do.
Supports deprescribing prophylaxis in clean pediatric urologic procedures; extends stewardship evidence to this population.
The main aim of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in urologic procedures is to prevent bacteraemia, surgical site infections (SSIs), and postoperative urinary tract infections (ppUTIs). Guidelines for SAP in paediatric urology are lacking. Only some aspects of this complex topic have been studied, and the use of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to surgical procedures seems to be more often linked to institutional schools of thought or experts' opinions than to rules dictated by studies demonstrating the most correct and preferred management. Therefore, the aim of this Consensus document realized using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method is to provide clinicians with a series of recommendations on SAP for the prevention of bacteraemia, SSIs, and ppUTIs after urologic imaging and surgical procedures in paediatric patients. Despite the few available studies, experts agree on some basilar concepts related to SAP for urologic procedures in paediatric patients. Before any urological procedure is conducted, UTI must be excluded. Clean procedures do not require SAP, with the exception of prosthetic device implantation and groin and perineal incisions where the SSI risk may be increased. In contrast, SAP is needed in clean-contaminated procedures. Studies have also suggested the safety of eliminating SAP in paediatric hernia repair and orchiopexy. To limit the emergence of resistance, every effort to reduce and rationalize antibiotic consumption for SAP must be made. Increased use of antibiotic stewardship can be greatly effective in this regard.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esposito et al. (2022) studied Urologic procedures in paediatric patients. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) was evaluated on Prevention of bacteraemia, surgical site infections (SSIs), and postoperative urinary tract infections (ppUTIs). A RAND/UCLA consensus recommends that clean urologic procedures in pediatric patients do not require surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, except for prosthetic implants and groin/perineal incisions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: