Key result
An 8-week behavioral physical activity intervention did not significantly alter overall cardiovascular structure, but improved left ventricular geometry in individuals with SCI below T6 (P<0.05).
Why the study?
It is unknown whether behavioral community-based physical activity interventions effectively generate cardiovascular adaptations in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Does a tailored behavioral physical activity intervention improve cardiac and vascular structure and function in individuals with spinal cord injury?
RCT (n=32)
Does a tailored behavioral physical activity intervention improve cardiac and vascular structure and function in individuals with spinal cord injury?
An 8-week behavioral physical activity intervention promotes adaptations in cardiac geometry in individuals with lower level (below T6) spinal cord injury, but not in the overall cohort.
May warrant tailored activity for LV geometry in below-T6 SCI; extends RCT evidence on exercise effects in spinal cord injury.
Background Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to a loss of descending motor and sympathetic control below the level of injury (LOI), which ultimately results in chronically altered cardiovascular function and remodeling. While supervised, laboratory-based exercise training can generate cardiovascular adaptations in people with SCI, it is unknown whether behavioral community-based interventions effectively generate such adaptations for individuals with SCI. Objective Examine the effects of a tailored behavioral physical activity (PA) intervention on cardiac and vascular structure and function in individuals with SCI. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 32 participants with SCI (18-65 years, SCI >1 year) were assigned to PA (8-week behavioral intervention) or control (CON) groups. At baseline and postintervention, measures of resting left ventricular (LV) structure and function, carotid intima-media thickness and pulse-wave velocity were assessed with ultrasound and tonometry. Results Twenty-eight participants completed the study (n = 14/group). Across the full study cohort there were no significant changes in indices of LV or vascular structure and function, despite notable improvements in peak power and oxygen uptake in the PA group. However, in a subanalysis for LOI, individuals in the PA group with LOIs below T6 had evidence of altered LV geometry (ie, increased LV internal diameter, reduced sphericity index and relative wall thickness; group × time P < 0.05 for all), which was not seen in individuals with higher LOIs at or above T6. Conclusion An 8-week behavioral PA intervention appears to promote adaptations in cardiac geometry more readily in individuals with lower level SCI than those with higher-level SCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Spinal cord injury (SCI) (n=32). Tailored behavioral physical activity (PA) intervention vs. Control was evaluated on Resting left ventricular (LV) structure and function, carotid intima-media thickness and pulse-wave velocity. An 8-week behavioral physical activity intervention did not significantly alter overall cardiovascular structure, but improved left ventricular geometry in individuals with SCI below T6 (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: